washington, dc

The Democratic Strategist

Political Strategy for a Permanent Democratic Majority

Creamer: Why They Must Be Stopped

As with any election, the 2010 mid terms require that Democrats not only define their beliefs, but also make a credible case why their adversaries should be defeated. Writing at HuffPo, Robert Creamer, author of Stand Up Straight: How Progressives Can Win, has a handy summary of reasons why the Republicans must not be allowed to win control of congress. Here’s some excerpts:

…Over the course of eight short years — between 2000 and 2008 — the Republicans methodically executed their plan to transform American society. They systematically transferred wealth from the middle class to the wealthiest two percent of Americans — slashing taxes for the wealthy. They eviscerated the rules that held Wall Street, Big Oil and private insurance companies accountable to the public. They allowed and encouraged the recklessness of the big Wall Street banks that ultimately collapsed the economy and cost eight million Americans their jobs. They ignored exploding health care costs, tried to privatize Social Security, gave the drug companies open season to gouge American consumers and presided over a decline in real incomes averaging $2,000 per family. They entangled America in an enormously costly, unnecessary war in Iraq, pursued a directionless policy that left Afghanistan to fester, and sullied America’s good name throughout the world.
Their economic policy of cutting taxes for the wealthy and deregulating big Corporations failed to create jobs. In fact, over his eight year term, George Bush’s administration created exactly zero net private sector jobs. They inherited a Federal budget with surpluses as far as the eye could see and rolled up more debt than all of the previous Presidents in the over 200 years of American history. And in the end they left the economy in collapse.
This was not a disaster that could be remedied overnight. By taking bold action at the beginning of his administration, President Obama and the Democrats in Congress prevented the financial crisis from morphing into a Great Depression…Obama, the Democrats and their progressive allies have — after a century of trying — finally passed health care reform allowing America to end its status as the only industrialized nation that did not provide health care as a right. They are on the brink of reining in the recklessness of the big Wall Street banks. And they have set the stage for massive long-term investments in economic growth and clean energy.

Creamer acknowledges the impatience of Americans about “the slow pace of economic recovery” and the “special interests that profited from their economic pain,” and he cites the Republicans’ “audacity” in arguing that Dems are to blame: “In effect they want the election to be a referendum on whether the Democrats have mopped and swept fast enough cleaning up the mess that they created.” Further, says Creamer,

They will do everything they can to prevent America from focusing on the real choice before them in the fall elections — a choice between going backward to the failed policies of the past that caused this catastrophe and a new direction that will create sustainable, long-term, bottom-up, widely shared economic growth. The real question before the country is whether it is willing to hand over the keys to the economy once again to the same gang that just caused the most serious economic pile up in 60 years.
…They still actually believe — despite what we have all just experienced — that by “freeing” big oil, the insurance companies and Wall Street banks of the “burdens” of government accountability, that the plutocrats and the “invisible hand” of the market will lead American into the promised land of economic prosperity.

If all that wasn’t crazy enough, Creamer describes a some of the most dangerous and destructive items on the GOP agenda:

* Meet Congressman Paul Ryan. Ryan is the ranking Republican on the House Budget Committee. If the Republicans once again take control of the House, he will be the Chair of the Budget Committee. Ryan believes — and says out loud — that Medicare, one of the most popular Federal programs in history, should be abolished and replaced with vouchers for private insurance. Let’s recall that one of the ways Republicans stirred up opposition to health insurance reform was by falsely accusing Democrats of wanting to cut Medicare. They convinced some unwitting seniors that “Government” should keep its hands off Medicare — which is, of course, a “Government” program. Democrats need to make it crystal clear in this campaign that Republicans — who opposed Medicare from its inception — actually want to abolish the program and hand over control of health care for America’s seniors to the same private insurance companies responsible for driving up rates three times faster than wages while their profits have exploded.
* Congressman John Boehner, the House Minority Leader, has endorsed another Ryan proposal to raise the retirement age of Social Security to 70 years old — a proposal that might go over fine with a guy like Boehner who makes speeches for a living. But it won’t be very popular at all with someone who has laid bricks, or run an earth mover, or waited tables for forty-five years.
* The whole Republican crew wants to resurrect the failed Bush proposal to “privatize” Social Security. The defeat of Bush’s privatization plan was the turning point in the Bush Presidency. It was all downhill from there. Yet — whether it’s to pad the investment accounts of their friends on Wall Street or because they are “private markets uber alles true believers” — the Republicans want to try it again. Only this time retirees won’t have to work very hard to imagine what it would have been like if their Social Security checks had plummeted in value the way their 401K’s did when the market collapsed just two years ago.
* The Republicans want to weaken and repeal the new law to rein in the recklessness of the big Wall Street banks. Most Republicans and Democrats voted to bail out the big banks to prevent a 1930’s style market collapse. The difference is that Democrats supported legislation to rein in their recklessness — that had cost 8 million Americans their jobs — and assure that a bailout was never allowed to happen again. But with very few exceptions, the Republicans voted to a person against holding Wall Street accountable. Given a chance, they plan to team up with their pals on Wall Street to free them to return to their reckless ways at will. In fact, they told the titans of Wall Street as much in fundraising meetings, where those “masters of the Universe” were asked to ante up. Republicans claim to oppose more Wall Street bailouts, but they refuse to support legislation that would prevent one in the future and hold Wall Street accountable. That — coupled with those big contributions from Wall Street — is a position that is very difficult for average voters to swallow. In fact, the polling says it’s down right toxic.
* Republicans have consistently voted against extending unemployment benefits to workers who have been laid off because of Bush-era policies and the recklessness of Wall Street. Remember, people who get unemployment benefits — by definition — are looking for jobs that the economy doesn’t provide. In addition, many Republicans actually believe that the best way to spur employment is to lower the minimum wage.
* Finally, meet Congressman Joe Barton. If the Republicans win back control of Congress, he would once again most likely serve as the Chairman of the Energy and Commerce Committee — the Committee that oversees the oil industry. Congressman Barton has never met an oil company he doesn’t like. In fact, he’s the guy who actually apologized to BP when they were forced by the Obama Administration to take economic responsibility for the disastrous Gulf oil spill. As a political matter, that’s like apologizing to Jack the Ripper…

As for the debate over whether Democrats should run a “localized” or “nationalized” campaign, Creamer has equally strong views:

We hear a lot about how Democrats have to “localize” the elections to have a chance of victory in November. And it is true that people vote for people in elections — and the quality of Democratic candidates will give them a major edge in many races. So while it is a good idea to “personalize” the races for Congress, the last thing Democrats should do is to “localize” them, because the party that nationalizes a midterm — and dominates the national dialogue — almost always comes out ahead.
Instead, Democrats need to take the offensive and dominate the national conversation by talking about what the Republicans actually believe and what they would do if they win in November. Voters must be offered a stark choice between Democratic and Republican policies in the fall. If they are, “Conventional Wisdom” that keeps predicting a Democratic disaster will be proven wrong, the same way it was when it predicted that America would never elect a tall, skinny African American guy named Barack Obama.

How well Dems meet Creamer’s challenge in the months ahead, and as the longer haul unfolds, will have significant bearing, not only on the Democratic Party’s prospects but also on America’s future.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.