Bush leads Kerry 48-45 percent among nation-wide RV’s, with 2 percent for Nader, 1 percent for none/other and 4 percent unsure, according to a Wall St. Journal/NBC News poll conducted Sept. 17-19.
TDS Strategy Memos
Latest Research from:
Editor’s Corner
By Ed Kilgore
-
December 18: Democratic Strategies for Coping With a Newly Trumpified Washington
After looking at various Democratic utterances about dealing with Trump 2.0, I wrote up a brief typology for New York:
The reaction among Democrats to Donald Trump’s return to power has been significantly more subdued than what we saw in 2016 after the mogul’s first shocking electoral win. The old-school “resistance” is dead, and it’s not clear what will replace it. But Democratic elected officials are developing new strategies for dealing with the new realities in Washington. Here are five distinct approaches that have emerged, even before Trump’s second administration has begun.
If you can’t beat ’em, (partially) join ’em
Some Democrats are so thoroughly impressed by the current power of the MAGA movement they are choosing to surrender to it in significant respects. The prime example is Senator John Fetterman of Pennsylvania, the onetime fiery populist politician who is now becoming conspicuous in his desire to admit his party’s weaknesses and snuggle up to the new regime. The freshman and one-time ally of Bernie Sanders has been drifting away from the left wing of his party for a good while, particularly via his vocally unconditional backing for Israel during its war in Gaza. But now he’s making news regularly for taking steps in Trump’s direction.
Quite a few Democrats publicly expressed dismay over Joe Biden’s pardon of his son Hunter, but Fetterman distinguished himself by calling for a corresponding pardon for Trump over his hush-money conviction in New York. Similarly, many Democrats have discussed ways to reach out to the voters they have lost to Trump. Fetterman’s approach was to join Trump’s Truth Social platform, which is a fever swamp for the president-elect’s most passionate supporters. Various Democrats are cautiously circling Elon Musk, Trump’s new best friend and potential slayer of the civil-service system and the New Deal–Great Society legacy of federal programs. But Fetterman seems to want to become Musk’s buddy, too, exchanging compliments with him in a sort of weird courtship. Fetterman has also gone out of his way to exhibit openness to support for Trump’s controversial Cabinet nominees even as nearly every other Senate Democrat takes the tack of forcing Republicans to take a stand on people like Pete Hegseth before weighing in themselves.
It’s probably germane to Fetterman’s conduct that he will be up for reelection in 2028, a presidential-election year in a state Trump carried on November 5. Or maybe he’s just burnishing his credentials as the maverick who blew up the Senate dress code.
Join ’em (very selectively) to beat ’em
Other Democrats are being much more selectively friendly to Trump, searching for “common ground” on issues where they believe he will be cross-pressured by his wealthy backers and more conventional Republicans. Like Fetterman, these Democrats — including Senators Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren — tend to come from the progressive wing of the party and have longed chafed at the centrist economic policies advanced by Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, and, to some extent, Joe Biden and Kamala Harris. They’ve talked about strategically encouraging Trump’s “populist” impulses on such issues as credit-card interest and big-tech regulation, partly as a matter of forcing the new president and his congressional allies to put up or shut up.
So the idea is to push off a discredited Democratic Establishment, at least on economic issues, and either accomplish things for working-class voters in alliance with Trump or prove the hollowness of his “populism.”
Colorado governor Jared Solis has offered a similar strategy of selective cooperation by praising the potential agenda of Trump HHS secretary nominee, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., as helpfully “shaking up” the medical and scientific Establishment.
Aim at the dead center
At the other end of the spectrum, some centrist Democrats are pushing off what they perceive as a discredited progressive ascendancy in the party, especially on culture-war issues and immigration. The most outspoken of them showed up at last week’s annual meeting of the avowedly nonpartisan No Labels organization, which was otherwise dominated by Republicans seeking to demonstrate a bit of independence from the next administration. These include vocal critics of the 2024 Democratic message like House members Jared Golden, Marie Gluesenkamp Perez, Ritchie Torres, and Seth Moulton, along with wannabe 2025 New Jersey gubernatorial candidate Josh Gottheimer (his Virginia counterpart, Abigail Spanberger, wasn’t at the No Labels confab but is similarly positioned ideologically).
From a strategic point of view, these militant centrists appear to envision a 2028 presidential campaign that will take back the voters Biden won in 2020 and Harris lost this year.
Cut a few deals to mitigate the damage
We’re beginning to see the emergence of a faction of Democrats that is willing to cut policy or legislative deals with Team Trump in order to protect some vulnerable constituencies from MAGA wrath. This is particularly visible on the immigration front; some congressional Democrats are talking about cutting a deal to support some of Trump’s agenda in exchange for continued protection from deportation of DREAMers. Politico reports:
“The prize that many Democrats would like to secure is protecting Dreamers — Americans who came with their families to the U.S. at a young age and have since been protected by the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program created by President Barack Obama in 2012.
“Trump himself expressed an openness to ‘do something about the Dreamers’ in a recent ‘Meet the Press’ interview. But he would almost certainly want significant policy concessions in return, including border security measures and changes to asylum law that Democrats have historically resisted.”
On a broader front, the New York Times has found significant support among Democratic governors to selectively cooperate with the new administration’s “mass deportation” plans in exchange for concessions:
“In interviews, 11 Democratic governors, governors-elect and candidates for the office often expressed defiance toward Mr. Trump’s expected immigration crackdown — but were also strikingly willing to highlight areas of potential cooperation.
“Several balanced messages of compassion for struggling migrants with a tough-on-crime tone. They said that they were willing to work with the Trump administration to deport people who had been convicted of serious crimes and that they wanted stricter border control, even as they vowed to defend migrant families and those fleeing violence in their home countries, as well as businesses that rely on immigrant labor.”
Hang tough and aim for a Democratic comeback
While the Democrats planning strategic cooperation with Trump are getting a lot of attention, it’s clear the bulk of elected officials and activists are more quietly waiting for the initial fallout from the new regime to develop while planning ahead for a Democratic comeback. This is particularly true among the House Democratic leadership, which hopes to exploit the extremely narrow Republican majority in the chamber (which will be exacerbated by vacancies for several months until Trump appointees can be replaced in special elections) on must-pass House votes going forward, while looking ahead with a plan to aggressively contest marginal Republican-held seats in the 2026 midterms. Historical precedents indicate very high odds that Democrats can flip the House in 2026, bringing a relatively quick end to any Republican legislative steamrolling on Trump’s behalf and signaling good vibes for 2028.
The 53% was from Rasmussen, which tracks daily.
AP poll just out with the president up by 9 among RV, and a 54% approval rating.
But here’s what’s interesing. Right track/Wrong Track 45/52, yet the president gets a 54% job approval rating. That’s a 9 point gap of people that think the country is on the wrong track, yet approve of the president’s job performance.
What to conclude?
1) The country is on the wrong track even though the president is doing a good job
2) They’re concerned about the track, but personally like the president and that makes them biased
Either way, the challenge for Senator Kerry to is close this gap and convince voters that the president’s policies are to blame. Furthermore, he has to convince voters that he can do better. Or, at least convince them that they should gamble that he couldn’t do much worse. Clinton and Perot teamed up to convince voters of this in 1992, but the effort so far this year has fallen short.
Bush is toast. If it weren’t for the 3 or 4 badly skewed polls out there, Republicans wouldn’t be claiming Bush is up at all.
All the efforts to create a sense of fate about the Bush campaign have failed.
The Dow is now 250 points lower than it was three weeks ago, when Bush allegedly had a double digit lead coming out of the RNC.
The Dow could drop below 10K tomorrow, and would have if Bush hadn’t used the SPR to lower prices. He had to, big oil asked him to. Bush is such a fraud, a complete tool of the oil industry, the only industry to have record profits in the past 3 years.
The WAR is a complete mess, and all the happy talk by Fox won’t change it. It is a bigger mess today than it has ever been, and it will be a bigger mess tomorrow. This is what happens when guys who don’t know anything about fighting engage in wars.
The WAR and OIL will dominate the dialogue for the next 40 days, and that means Bush loses.
I predict polls will begin to show Kerry ahead following the first debate, and he will remain ahead. Not the bad ones like Gallup, but the real ones.
Not to dispute your approval ratings, but where are you getting his rating as high as 53% (is this for terrorism) b/c frankly I have not seen numbers that high anywhere except for his ability to handle terrorism. His approval rating on Iraq are low. His approval on the economy are low. The only place they have been consistently high is again on terrorism (moment of partisan opinion: is anyone else confused by this difference in ratings?) His ratings have consistently hovered at or been slightly below 50 percent, and have begun in last 2 weeks to creep down a point or two. So I am curious- where are you getting these numbers?
Well Bill Makuch, what about the above Economist poll that showed Bush at 43%, and what about Zogby’s 45% approval rating?
Here’s the latest round of approval rating polls:
Rasmussen: 53%, NBC 47%, CBS 50% unless that’s a forged poll, Battleground 53%, Gallup 52%, Annenburg 52%, Newsweek 48%, Time 56%, A.P. 52%, Fox 49%, ABC 52%
Source: http://www.realclearpolitics.com/Presidential_04/bush_ja.html
Based on this, the president is in good, but not great shape for re-election as of today. Of course, there’s still 40 days until the election.
I may be wrong, but wasn’t Quinnipac the same poll that, four years ago said that Maryland was gonna be close? In reality, MD landslided to Gore 56-40.
So, Quinnipiac puts Bush ahead. Fair game. Kerry’s gonna catch up again considering the attitudes towards the war and the economy.
But what on earth does that have to do with the hurricanes? I think this is just a weird contention that the Republicans would like to spread amongst the pundits. Or did I miss Dubya strolling around in rubber boots?
By the way, EDM team: I’m sure I’m not the only one who finds it exhausting scrolling down huge copied articles. I think some important exerpts or a synopsis or the link would be enough.
Smooth: I see your Quinnipac Florida poll and raise it this ARG poll:
American Research Group, Inc.
State: Florida
Electoral votes: 27
Sample size: 600 likely voters
Sample dates: Sep 17-20
Margin of error: Plus or minus 4 percentage points
Bush Kerry Nader Others Undecided
Total 45 46 2 1 6
Party:* Contribution Bush Kerry Nader Others Undecided
Republicans 39% 85 8 1 1 5
Democrats 42% 9 82 2 1 6
Independents/Other 19% 44 46 2 1 7
Sex:
Men 45% 50 43 2 1 4
Women 55% 41 49 1 1 7
* Are you registered to vote as a Republican, a Democrat, or something else?
Back to ARG home
UNIV OF WISCONSIN/BADGER POLL: GWB LEADS KERRY BY 14 AMONG WISCONSIN REGISTERED VOTERS….
http://www.jsonline.com/news/state/sep04/261050.asp
Milwaukee Journal Sentinel
Sep 23, 2004
On average, Bush leads state, but poll numbers vary widely
Surveys in Wisconsin reflect state’s crucial role in election
By CRAIG GILBERT
cgilbert@journalsentinel.com
Posted: Sept. 22, 2004
Reflecting a similar pattern in national surveys, a raft of new Wisconsin polls offers divergent pictures of the presidential race, from a dead heat to a burgeoning lead for George W. Bush.
According to a new statewide Badger Poll, Bush enjoys a clear advantage in Wisconsin, a state Democrats have carried since the 1980s and can ill afford to lose.
Bush not only leads Democrat John Kerry by double digits in the poll, but is viewed much more favorably by Wisconsinites and enjoys an immense advantage on the issue of terrorism.
A new ABC News poll of likely voters in Wisconsin offers similar findings. Bush holds a 10-point lead in that survey, enjoys a big edge over Kerry on handling terrorism and Iraq, and is seen by far more voters as a strong leader.
A poll released last week by Gallup also showed Bush leading Kerry, in that case by eight points.
But that’s not the whole story.
In non-partisan Wisconsin surveys released this week by the American Research Group, Mason-Dixon and Zogby Interactive, Bush and Kerry are within two points of each other.
The sheer volume of public polling in the state is a measure of Wisconsin’s competitiveness and strategic importance.
Who’s really winning?
But what does it say about where things stand between Bush and Kerry?
Political scientist Charles Franklin of the University of Wisconsin said that given the normal variation from one poll to another, the surveys should be taken together.
“Averaging across three or four or five polls in a similar time period is a way better estimate of what opinion in the state really is than counting on any one poll for everything,” Franklin said.
That would put the race about where some outside analysts see it: a Bush advantage, perhaps mid-single digits, but one that is hardly etched in stone.
The Badger Poll, taken Sept. 15-21 by the University of Wisconsin Survey Center, interviewed 504 eligible voters. Among them, Bush led Kerry 52% to 38%, with independent Ralph Nader at 4%. The results were the same when only likely voters were questioned.
Pollster G. Donald Ferree Jr. said the survey suggests that while views of the incumbent president are somewhat mixed, “at least in the short run, Kerry has not been doing very well in meeting the test of being that acceptable alternative.”
In a June Badger Poll, 36% of those surveyed had a favorable impression of Kerry and 36% had an unfavorable impression.
In the new poll, Kerry’s favorable rating remained the same, but his unfavorable rating climbed to 48%.
Bush’s advantages over Kerry are striking in some areas. Asked who will protect the United States from terrorism, 52% said Bush and 15% said Kerry. That margin grew over the last Badger Poll in June. Asked who has a consistent record on the issues, 46% said Bush and 16% said Kerry.
Neither candidate enjoyed an advantage on the questions of who would improve the economy, deal well with the federal budget or understand the problems ordinary people face. Kerry enjoyed an edge on protecting the environment.
Ferree said he thinks the election dynamics in the state are “playing to Bush’s strengths at the moment. (But) I do not think this reflects a settled and determined choice.”
In the ABC poll released Wednesday night, Kerry enjoys a small advantage among Wisconsin voters on jobs and health care, but Bush has a much larger edge on handling terrorism and Iraq. Bush also enjoys a big edge on a number of personal attributes, from taking clear stands, to being a strong leader to having an appealing personality.
In the ABC poll, as in the Badger Poll, more people had a negative view of Kerry than positive view. That wasn’t true of Bush.
But both the ABC and Mason-Dixon polls found significant division and unease over the war in Iraq. Half of registered voters in the ABC poll said the war in Iraq wasn’t worth fighting.
Bush’s best bet
The two campaigns are fighting fiercely over Wisconsin’s 10 electoral votes. Even some Democrats believe Wisconsin is Bush’s best opportunity to pick up a state he lost in 2000. Among the reasons: the closeness (two-tenths of percentage point) of the contest four years ago; a 2004 job rebound that is stronger than in other battlegrounds; and the Bush campaign’s intense strategic focus on the state.
The President will make his fourth bus trip in Wisconsin Friday, stopping in Janesville and Racine. Kerry, meanwhile, will spend parts of four days in the state beginning Sunday, a stretch largely devoted to preparation for his first debate with Bush next Thursday in south Florida.
Kerry spokesman George Twigg termed the Badger Poll flawed.
“The majority of polling continues to show this race is a dead heat. If there’s any advantage (for Bush), it’s very slight,” said Twigg.
“We continue to believe that Bush’s wrong priorities on health care costs and job losses and other key issues are going to hurt him in the long run,” Twigg said.
Twigg also contended that the pool of voters surveyed in the Badger Poll was skewed toward Republicans. Republicans accounted for 36% of those surveyed in the Badger Poll, Democrats 29%. In the ABC poll, Republicans made up 35% of the likely voters surveyed, Democrats 29%.
Twigg pointed out that Democrats were a bigger share of the state’s 2000 voters than Republicans, according to exit polls.
Franklin, of the University of Wisconsin, said that’s one reason to view these polls as a snapshot rather than a forecast, since the makeup of the state’s electorate in November is unlikely to be as Republican as it is in the latest Badger Poll.
Bush strategist Sara Taylor said Wednesday that in the aggregate the recent polls suggest the president enjoys a lead of five or six points in Wisconsin, similar to where the race is nationally, she said. She contended Kerry has been hurt by campaign stumbles in the state, including fumbling the name of the Green Bay Packers’ Lambeau Field, calling it “Lambert.”
“Also, the economy has improved. That has an impact,” said Taylor. “But it’s certainly a state that’s going to be very competitive to the end.”
The disparity in current polls is not confined to Wisconsin. For instance, a recent national Gallup poll taken Sept. 13-15 gave Bush a 14-point lead, while a Pew poll taken Sept. 11-14 gave Bush a one-point lead. In a poll released Wednesday by NBC News, Bush’s lead was four points.
Pollsters say some of the differences reflect volatility in the electorate, some reflect different techniques for sampling voters and identifying who is and isn’t likely to vote.
But much of the polling spread is simply normal variation, said Franklin, who has monitored the differences in presidential survey results throughout the year.
“These variations are fairly typical of how much variation we see in polling,” says Franklin. He said the average variation in presidential polls in this race has been between seven and eights points in each direction.
“If Bush is up by seven, you’d expect to see, out of a bunch of polls, one or two showing him up by 12 or 14 and one or two show him down by one,” said Franklin.
Bill Makuch, will you please cite those latest polls that show Bush above 50%? If they include Gallup and CBS, they’re the two that over-sampled Republicans, so naturally the approval rating would be as artificially higher as the match-up numbers.
The polls I’ve seen recently still show Bush below 50 — some not that much (47-48-49), but still below the Mendoza line. No question Bush is in better shape that Bush I or Carter, but leveling out in Gerry Ford territory is nothing to get cocky about.
I see no poliical history suggesting challenger favorability rating matters much. The Carter people did a great job highlighting all Reagan’s negatives — it’s the reason he couldn’t take a consistent poll lead despite Carter’s problems — but, come Election Day, Carter still polled his approval rating and Reagan harvested most of the rest (though the Anderson anomaly clouded the results).
Put it simply: relying on a challenger’s weaknesses to re-elect an unpopular incumbent is not a smart bet.
The Weird NJ polls appear to be just that…weird.
Compare with American Research Group’s poll this week, which shows an 8 point Kerry lead in NJ. That’s much more like what we’ll see there in Nov. Some of the outlier polling was conducted on or near 9/11 and some of it just appears to be statistical noise.
Sleep tight, everyone.
Yes, I, too, would like Ruy — or anyone expert in this — to give us some insights into job approval as a predictor. As for direction of country, Gallup — for what that’s worth — says that the latter is predictive only with the attribution of causality. I think I read that here in Ruy’s blog.
Also, I’ve heard some relatively disinterested people on political talk shows say that an incumbent below 50% is in deep trouble.
Any clinical — and not ideology — driven insights into these?
Call me Curious in Catalina.
Job approval as predictor:
I haven’t seen any discussion here on this topic. The president’s low point this year was 41% in a May poll by CBS. In May of 1980, President Carter was at 43%, while President George H. Bush was at 42%. However, their numbers continued sinking and were in the 30%’s by election day. On the other hand, President Bush is now above 50% in 4 of the last 5 polls. Even the lowest reading, 47% in the NBC poll, is a far cry from the 34% and 38% readings of the last two incumbents that lost (I’m ignoring the Economist because we don’t have a track record on them). Furthermore, Senator Kerry’s approval ratings are dismal, with favorable ratings in the 30’s. I haven’t seen any history on this, but it’s hard to believe a challenger with such low ratings could be elected.
Panic,
I believe the ARG poll puts New Jersey at Bush 42 Kerry 50.
NBC/WSJ has a very credible poll, run by Dems and Reps; And I wouldn’t dispute national polls being close nationwide.
However, Kerry will not be bouyed by the following: QUNNIPIAC POLLS SHOWS GWB UP BY 8 POINTS IN FLORIDA. I can assure you that Quinnipiac is NOT a right wing poll.
Keep in mind Kerry HAS to win one big red state (ie FLA or OH) or multiple red states (WV, NEV & NH) to make up for the census changes. Given recent polls showing Kerry noticeably trailing in FLA & OH, his path becomes much more difficult gievn the latest numbers.
It’s looking increasingly like the debates will be Kerry’s last shot, barring some unforseen cataclysmic event.
http://www.quinnipiac.edu/x12941.xml
Quinnipiac University
Sep 23, 2004
Polling Results
September 23, 2004 – Hurricanes Blow Bush Into Lead In Florida, Quinnipiac University Poll Finds; Senate Race Is Too Close To Call
President George W. Bush leads Democratic challenger John Kerry 49 – 41 percent, with 5 percent for independent candidate Ralph Nader, among Florida voters, according to a Quinnipiac University poll released today.
This reverses Kerry’s 47 – 41 percent lead among registered voters in an August 12 poll by the independent Quinnipiac (KWIN uh-pe-ack) University.
With Nader out of the race, Bush has a 48 – 43 percent lead over Kerry.
Florida voters give Bush a 50 – 47 percent approval rating, reversing a 54 – 44 percent disapproval August 12. Voters approve 78 – 14 percent of the way President Bush has responded to recent hurricanes.
Voters also approve 87 – 9 percent of the way Gov. Jeb Bush has responded to the hurricanes, pushing Gov. Bush’s overall approval to 62 – 30 percent, up from a 45 – 44 percent split August 12.
“The ill winds of the hurricane season have blown a lot of political good for President Bush in Florida pushing him ahead of Sen. John Kerry who led in the Sunshine State in August,” said Clay F. Richards, assistant director of the Quinnipiac University Polling Institute.
“When a chief executive shows up in a time of crisis acting like a strong leader, his support rises dramatically. That’s what the hurricanes have done for President Bush – and his brother, Gov. Jeb Bush in Florida,” Richards added.
Florida voters give President Bush a 45 – 36 percent favorability rating, with 14 percent mixed. This reverses a negative 38 – 43 percent favorability August 12.
Kerry gets a negative 34 – 41 percent favorability rating, with 19 percent mixed, down from a 39 – 31 percent favorability August 12.
Looking at presidential qualities, Florida voters say:
57 – 37 percent that Bush is more of a leader than Kerry;
54 – 37 percent that Bush does a better job explaining what he will do as President.
“The hurricanes were indeed ill winds for Kerry who loses badly to Bush when voters are asked which candidate acts more like a leader and which one gives a clearer view of what he would do as President,” Richards said.
Florida voters say 46 – 49 percent that going to war in Iraq was the wrong thing to do. Only 40 percent say the U.S. economy is ‘excellent’ or ‘good,’ while 59 percent say it is ‘not so good’ or ‘poor.’ Senate Race
In the U.S. Senate race, Democrat Betty Castor gets 43 percent, while Republican Mel Martinez gets 42 percent, a statistical tie.
“The Senate race is a dead heat right now as Florida voters struggle to learn about two candidates who have been competing with hurricanes and presidential candidates for the political spotlight. Both Martinez and Castor are unknown factors to about four in 10 Florida voters,” Richards said.
From September 18 – 21, Quinnipiac University surveyed 819 Florida registered voters with a margin of error of +/- 3.4 percentage points.
The Quinnipiac University Poll, directed by Douglas Schwartz, Ph.D., conducts public opinion surveys in Florida, Pennsylvania, New York, New Jersey, Connecticut and the nation as a public service and for research. For additional data — http://www.quinnipiac.edu and quicklinks
It’s easy. The polls that are real are the ones that show the race fairly tight. The ones that don’t show the race tight are flawed.
Does anyone have the party ID for the NBC/WSJ poll? At this point, I consider all bottom-line results to be worthless without this data (or data on who participants voted for in 2000).
Thanks.
The New ‘Economist’ poll out today has Kerry ahead by one point and shows Bush’s approval rating at a dismal 43%. For what it’s worth.
http://www.economist.com/media/pdf/YouGovl.pdf
Hello all,
Does Ruy or any poster have any comment on the alarming polling coming out of NJ? How did Kerry lose a 20 point lead, to now looking at a dead heat here?
—