washington, dc

The Democratic Strategist

Political Strategy for a Permanent Democratic Majority

GOP Will Pay Very High Price for Its Assault on Black Representation

Watching with horror the Supreme Court-enabled assault on majority-Black districts made me tremble with fear for the 2026 midterms, but also tremble with fury at the GOP, as I explained at New York:

Republicans from Donald Trump on down are excited that the landmark Supreme Court ruling in Louisiana v. Callais has invited a wave of partisan gerrymanders in states they control. This could save GOP control of the House in November’s elections, and lead to even bigger gains over the next few election cycles. The Virginia Supreme Court’s shock decision on Friday invalidating a voter-approved retaliatory pro-Democratic gerrymander in that state has added to their excitement. But Republicans would be wise to take a beat to think about what the gerrymandering frenzy is likely to do to their efforts to shed their reputation as a lily-white party hostile to minority voters.

As recently as 2024, there was a lot of talk about the Donald Trump-led GOP bringing back a “big tent” appeal to nonwhite voters, despite the boss’s alleged lapses into racism. And indeed, Trump achieved a higher share of the Black vote (15 percent) than any Republican presidential candidate since 1960 — nearly doubling his percentage from four years earlier — despite facing a Black Democratic opponent. His percentage reached 21 percent among Black men, according to Pew’s authoritative validated voter study. It looked to some GOP optimists like the beginning of a realignment. Perhaps Democrats would no longer be able to count on Black voters as a key element of the party base, with particularly importance in battleground states ranging from Michigan and Pennsylvania to Georgia and North Carolina.

This narrative has already taken a beating thanks to Trump’s second-term record. A May 4 Economist-YouGov survey showed that just nine percent of Black Americans approve of the president’s job performance, while 8o percent disapprove (and 70 percent disapprove strongly). But the Trump-blessed state GOP assault on Black representation in Congress (and soon enough, state legislatures) that Callais has now unleashed is almost certainly going to blight the GOP brand for a long time among Black voters already deeply unhappy with the direction of the country under Republican management.

Already, with the White House urging them on, southern Republicans are taking aim at immediate extinction of majority-Black congressional districts in Louisiana, Alabama, Tennessee, South Carolina, and (possibly) Mississippi. The potential target list includes long-serving, venerable figures like South Carolina’s Jim Clyburn and Mississippi’s Bennie Thompson, whose careers date back to the civil rights movement. And other majority-Black districts will almost certainly be targeted by Republicans in 2028, 2030, and 2032 in states that couldn’t (mostly because they were too far along in the 2026 election calendar) take a hammer to them this year. The New York Times estimates that ten majority-Black congressional districts could be eliminated by gerrymanders just in the South, while one Black voting rights advocacy group claims 25 Black members of Congress (plus 191 Black state legislators) are at extreme risk once Callais has been fully implemented.

After decades of slow progress, the percentage of Black representatives in Congress and state legislatures is now roughly equivalent to the Black percentage of the population. Numbers aside, the psychological blow of reversing that progress overnight could be immense, much like the boulder rolling back down the hill in the ancient myth of Sisyphus. It would be one thing if the realignment simply replaced Black Democrats with Black Republicans. But at present, there are only five Black Republicans in Congress, as compared to 62 Black Democrats. Thanks to retirements and decisions to run for other offices, the number of Black GOP members of Congress will probably drop to one (South Carolina Senator Tim Scott) after the 2026 midterms. So decimating Black Democrats — particularly in the South — will feel to many Black Americans like a slide back towards Jim Crow. It’s especially perverse to see the Supreme Court use the 14th and 15th Amendments — Amendments enacted to give ex-slaves equal rights — to justify the bleaching of legislative bodies in a sort of counter-Reconstruction re-enthroning the South’s traditional conservative white oligarchs.

It’s no wonder the first wave in the current tide of Republican gerrymanders, in Tennessee, drew civil rights protesters to Nashville. Black voting rights protests have also broken out in Alabama and Louisiana as legislators mull new partisan gerrymanders.

It’s a scene Republicans had better get used to if they persist in their current course. Their “big tent” is in tatters.

2 comments on “GOP Will Pay Very High Price for Its Assault on Black Representation

  1. quenqvicecity on

    Ed Kilgore’s piece about the GOP’s gerrymandering frenzy targeting majority-Black districts, like those of Jim Clyburn and Bennie Thompson, after the Louisiana v. Callais ruling, really makes me think about what this means for their ‘big tent’ strategy; it feels a bit like a real-life quenq vice city scenario where power plays are overt, and it makes me wonder what social implications this will bring to the upcoming 2026 midterms.

    Reply
  2. William Benjamin Bankston on

    I’ve lambasted Ruy Teixeira over and over again for the last year and a half for ignoring all but his favorite ten to twenty percent of electoral test cases of the center, but he’s right about one thing: Democrats have got to quit living in the past when it comes to racial voting. Thus far, cross tabs of polls have shown Republicans doing as well or a little better with the black community even as they seem poised to get hit by a blue wave. And unless you assume that Dems will get all the “don’t know” and “say I won’t vote but will” categories, Republicans’ Latino support isn’t even down to 2020 levels.

    Will these racial gerrymanders change that? Stuff like this hasn’t in a long time. Please pardon me if I’m waiting to see it before I believe it. Three things to note that might help you out here, Ed:

    1. The developing world is culturally conservative. “Modernity” is a big knock on the West. Meaning that we’re not gender-retro, anti-LGBT, or hyper-religious enough for them. This also applies to East Europeans and Russians, by the way.

    2. Polarization is getting the apostates out of both parties. Not entirely unlike the South.

    3. Last but not least, the Republicans’ new nonwhite voters are young. That means that they have no memory of Jim Crow, the police brutality cases of the 1980’s, Mark Fuhrman, or even Hurricane Katrina. This could be an underrated factor here.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *